|
Posted by jwarner1 on March 8, 2010, 11:37 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Once again, economic conduitions are forcing educators to lay off
teachers,
close programs and buildings, and trim educational expectations.
Club's who can share their robotic scopes with wschool systems could
provide
a badly needed resource!
Club's who have dallied for ten years+ spending over $125,000 (some say
$150,000!) and still argue and cant get their systems to work, should
stowe
their ego's and put up or shut up ... and maybe turn their $125,000
dollar
assets over to others who can get a simple dpdt switch to work, without
starting World War III !? Yes. It really is almost that simple.
Just do it!
|
|
Posted by Martin Brown on March 9, 2010, 3:29 am
Please log in for more thread options
jwarner1 wrote:
show/hide quoted text
> Once again, economic conduitions are forcing educators to lay off
> teachers,
> close programs and buildings, and trim educational expectations.
Is observational astronomy anywhere on the core curriculum in the USA?
There is an Astronomy GCSE in the UK but it is almost rarely taught in
state (US public) schools. Core curriculum comes first. Clubs sometimes
teach it if there is enough interest among the junior members.
show/hide quoted text
>
> Club's who can share their robotic scopes with wschool systems could
> provide
> a badly needed resource!
In the UK there is enough high class robotic scope time to go round
already thanks to the generosity of various donors. The shortage is of
amateurs and teachers who can teach about astronomy, maths and physics.
http://www.astro.ljmu.ac.uk/RoboNet/
http://www.telescope.org/
Being two examples of 2m class scopes available for schools (and others
to use remotely).
show/hide quoted text
>
> Club's who have dallied for ten years+ spending over $125,000 (some say
> $150,000!) and still argue and cant get their systems to work, should
> stowe
> their ego's and put up or shut up ... and maybe turn their $125,000
> dollar
> assets over to others who can get a simple dpdt switch to work, without
> starting World War III !? Yes. It really is almost that simple.
> Just do it!
Were you thrown out of your local astronomy society or something?
Regards,
Martin Brown
|
|
Posted by jwarner1 on March 17, 2010, 11:52 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Martin Brown wrote:
show/hide quoted text
> jwarner1 wrote:
> > Once again, economic conduitions are forcing educators to lay off
> > teachers,
> > close programs and buildings, and trim educational expectations.
> Is observational astronomy anywhere on the core curriculum in the USA?
> There is an Astronomy GCSE in the UK but it is almost rarely taught in
> state (US public) schools. Core curriculum comes first. Clubs sometimes
> teach it if there is enough interest among the junior members.
> > Club's who can share their robotic scopes with wschool systems could
> > provide
> > a badly needed resource!
> In the UK there is enough high class robotic scope time to go round
> already thanks to the generosity of various donors. The shortage is of
> amateurs and teachers who can teach about astronomy, maths and physics.
> http://www.astro.ljmu.ac.uk/RoboNet/
> http://www.telescope.org/
> Being two examples of 2m class scopes available for schools (and others
> to use remotely).
> > Club's who have dallied for ten years+ spending over $125,000 (some say
> > $150,000!) and still argue and cant get their systems to work, should
> > stowe
> > their ego's and put up or shut up ... and maybe turn their $125,000
> > dollar
> > assets over to others who can get a simple dpdt switch to work, without
> > starting World War III !? Yes. It really is almost that simple.
> > Just do it!
> Were you thrown out of your local astronomy society or something?
> Regards,
> Martin Brown
Not yet anyway (smile). When it became evident our robotic program
was bogging down with acrimony on all sides (10 years later!) I suggested
we either scrap what we had and start over or simply buy in to someone
else's robotic program IF the club really wanted a ronbotic option. The
vote was NO as it always is. So 3 or 4 guys sit with this huge investment
and nothing happening, now there is a lack of staff to even supervise the
project, and the project has literally bled the club to death - and now
these
idiots want $6000-$8000 more to try a new gamble! It's crazy.
But these guys will never concede. They would see our (their!) club
destroyed first.
This insanity has ripped our club apart due to the huge egos involved.
Its sad.
|
|
Posted by Martin Brown on March 18, 2010, 5:43 am
Please log in for more thread options
jwarner1 wrote:
show/hide quoted text
>
> Martin Brown wrote:
>
>> jwarner1 wrote:
>>> Once again, economic conduitions are forcing educators to lay off
>>> teachers,
>>> close programs and buildings, and trim educational expectations.
>> Is observational astronomy anywhere on the core curriculum in the USA?
>> There is an Astronomy GCSE in the UK but it is almost rarely taught in
>> state (US public) schools. Core curriculum comes first. Clubs sometimes
>> teach it if there is enough interest among the junior members.
>>> Club's who can share their robotic scopes with wschool systems could
>>> provide
>>> a badly needed resource!
>> In the UK there is enough high class robotic scope time to go round
>> already thanks to the generosity of various donors. The shortage is of
>> amateurs and teachers who can teach about astronomy, maths and physics.
>> http://www.astro.ljmu.ac.uk/RoboNet/
>> http://www.telescope.org/
>> Being two examples of 2m class scopes available for schools (and others
>> to use remotely).
>>> Club's who have dallied for ten years+ spending over $125,000 (some say
>>> $150,000!) and still argue and cant get their systems to work, should
>>> stowe
>>> their ego's and put up or shut up ... and maybe turn their $125,000
>>> dollar
>>> assets over to others who can get a simple dpdt switch to work, without
>>> starting World War III !? Yes. It really is almost that simple.
>>> Just do it!
>> Were you thrown out of your local astronomy society or something?
>> Regards,
>> Martin Brown
>
> Not yet anyway (smile). When it became evident our robotic program
> was bogging down with acrimony on all sides (10 years later!) I suggested
> we either scrap what we had and start over or simply buy in to someone
> else's robotic program IF the club really wanted a ronbotic option. The
> vote was NO as it always is. So 3 or 4 guys sit with this huge investment
> and nothing happening, now there is a lack of staff to even supervise the
> project, and the project has literally bled the club to death - and now
> these
> idiots want $6000-$8000 more to try a new gamble! It's crazy.
>
> But these guys will never concede. They would see our (their!) club
> destroyed first.
>
> This insanity has ripped our club apart due to the huge egos involved.
>
> Its sad.
From your post it sounds more like *you* are a part of the problem than
a part of the solution. Project management must be pretty lousy if they
show/hide quoted text
failed to make progress for 10 years and spent >$100k. But then we only
have your word for that. Where is this mythical beast?
Most clubs I know manage to do a lot with volunteers time, local talent
and a modest investment in component parts.
If you cannot get on with them move to another club!
Regards,
Martin Brown
|
|
Posted by on March 21, 2010, 11:56 am
Please log in for more thread options
wrote:
show/hide quoted text
> jwarner1 wrote:
> > Once again, economic conduitions are forcing educators to lay off
> > teachers,
> > close programs and buildings, and trim educational expectations.
> Is observational astronomy anywhere on the core curriculum in the USA?
> There is an Astronomy GCSE in the UK but it is almost rarely taught in
> state (US public) schools. Core curriculum comes first. Clubs sometimes
> teach it if there is enough interest among the junior members.
> > Club's who can share their robotic scopes with wschool systems could
> > provide
> > a badly needed resource!
> In the UK there is enough high class robotic scope time to go round
> already thanks to the generosity of various donors.
So why are the scopes are under-utilized?
Dark, clear skies are generally more accessible in the US, and the
cost of equipment seems to be lower compared to income, so students
and amateurs have more opportunities to pursue astronomy on their own.
show/hide quoted text
> The shortage is of
> amateurs and teachers who can teach about astronomy, maths and physics.
With all of the GCSEs in the UK system, you'd think there wouldn't be
a shortage.
show/hide quoted text
> http://www.astro.ljmu.ac.uk/RoboNet/http://www.telescope.org/
> Being two examples of 2m class scopes available for schools (and others
> to use remotely).
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | Meade MAX Robotic Mount | February 26, 2006, 1:30 pm |
| Re: ZZZ - SSC07 - "Role Reversal" M/F - (Not My Kink) | September 4, 2007, 10:30 pm |
| Density has starring role in making stars massive | March 2, 2008, 1:21 pm |
| Do you wax your scopes? | March 27, 2007, 11:16 am |
| At last e scopes almost | April 9, 2007, 12:52 pm |
| Scopes dripping wet | December 29, 2005, 10:21 pm |
| Smartfinder on PE scopes | January 2, 2006, 3:47 pm |
| Ebay Scopes | April 6, 2007, 4:44 pm |
| Re: Coming scopes | June 1, 2007, 8:45 am |
| Re: Coming scopes | June 11, 2007, 3:26 pm |
|
> teachers,
> close programs and buildings, and trim educational expectations.