|
Posted by erosz on July 26, 2005, 7:33 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Looking forward to seeing what the B-57's caught in HD. Hopefully, more
and more cameras will start broadcasting (live) in HD. Yeah, films can ne
transfered to HD video months after the event to be aired on short
"Discovery HD" mini-segments, but wouldn't it be cool to watch it in HD
live? It'd be great to record it in HD too, either DVR or whenever HD-DVD
or BluRay actually sees the light of day. I'm not wanting to "over-analyze"
the video of launch (frame by frame), but to just sit back and see it for
all it's beauty and to see the forest for the trees.
How about more "Hollywood-angles" too? Like, perhaps, live HD video feeds
from inside the cockpit right behind commander/pilot and looking out the
front windshields. That be a cool as hell vantage point when they start
doing their rolls and the Earth's horizon comes into view. Maybe some
"extreme angles" looking back at the Earth, falling away, over the wing.
The extra weight of cameras could be justified by just cutting a few BS
small "side projects" that the shuttles always carry up. (Could anyone care
less about the effects of weighlessness of an ant colony?)
Being able to "fully immerse" viewers into the launch would also generate
much more support. I've seen many actual launches in person and while they
are more exciting than watching it on TV, it isn't as interesting. TV
viewing simply doesn't have the "exciting" aspect, mainly because its always
been the same type of camera points-of-view for decades. With HD and a
"fresh" approach, it could be awesome though.
Anyway, random musings..
Cheers!
|
|
Posted by Jeff Findley on July 26, 2005, 4:59 pm
Please log in for more thread options
show/hide quoted text
> The extra weight of cameras could be justified by just cutting a few BS
> small "side projects" that the shuttles always carry up. (Could anyone
care
show/hide quoted text
> less about the effects of weighlessness of an ant colony?)
Exactly what "b.s. side projects" would those be? I think you'll find that
the "b.s. side projects" were killed long ago due to the payload penalty the
shuttle takes by going to the high inclination orbit of ISS.
Jeff
--
Remove icky phrase from email address to get a valid address.
|
|
Posted by Derek Lyons on July 26, 2005, 11:10 pm
Please log in for more thread options
show/hide quoted text
>Being able to "fully immerse" viewers into the launch would also generate
>much more support.
If we have to depend on 'sexing up' the TV coverage for support - we
might as well give up now and save the cash.
D.
--
Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh.
-Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings.
Oct 5th, 2004 JDL
|
|
Posted by BobGoFish on July 30, 2005, 10:27 am
Please log in for more thread options How about a small camera on the tip of the vertical stabilizer? One
looking aft and one looking forward. That would be cool.
erosz wrote:
show/hide quoted text
>Looking forward to seeing what the B-57's caught in HD. Hopefully, more
>and more cameras will start broadcasting (live) in HD. Yeah, films can ne
>transfered to HD video months after the event to be aired on short
>"Discovery HD" mini-segments, but wouldn't it be cool to watch it in HD
>live? It'd be great to record it in HD too, either DVR or whenever HD-DVD
>or BluRay actually sees the light of day. I'm not wanting to "over-analyze"
>the video of launch (frame by frame), but to just sit back and see it for
>all it's beauty and to see the forest for the trees.
>How about more "Hollywood-angles" too? Like, perhaps, live HD video feeds
>from inside the cockpit right behind commander/pilot and looking out the
>front windshields. That be a cool as hell vantage point when they start
>doing their rolls and the Earth's horizon comes into view. Maybe some
>"extreme angles" looking back at the Earth, falling away, over the wing.
>The extra weight of cameras could be justified by just cutting a few BS
>small "side projects" that the shuttles always carry up. (Could anyone care
>less about the effects of weighlessness of an ant colony?)
>Being able to "fully immerse" viewers into the launch would also generate
>much more support. I've seen many actual launches in person and while they
>are more exciting than watching it on TV, it isn't as interesting. TV
>viewing simply doesn't have the "exciting" aspect, mainly because its always
>been the same type of camera points-of-view for decades. With HD and a
>"fresh" approach, it could be awesome though.
>Anyway, random musings..
>Cheers!
>
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | Some more launch video | August 4, 2005, 10:54 pm |
| STS-114 Launch video needed. | July 1, 2006, 10:44 am |
| sts-121 Launch video update | July 4, 2006, 4:41 pm |
| Just discovered this Video STS 115 Launch HQ | September 26, 2006, 6:21 am |
| Concept definition: Prest amigo??? | September 8, 2006, 10:36 am |
| Has the cockpit launch video for STS-114 been released? | August 13, 2005, 6:00 pm |
| Soyuz launch video much better than shuttle's! | September 18, 2006, 8:54 pm |
| FANTASTIS Shuttle Launch VIDEO | December 8, 2006, 11:09 am |
| a FANTASTIC Shuttle Launch VIDEO !!! | December 8, 2006, 11:14 am |
| Shuttle launch in-cabin video. | March 19, 2008, 6:15 am |
|
> small "side projects" that the shuttles always carry up. (Could anyone