|
|
|
|
|
Posted by Mike on December 15, 2006, 7:27 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Can anyone identify where in the world the shuttle was over when this
photo was taken?
http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/images/shuttle/sts-116/html/s116e05983.html
--
|
|
Posted by Brian Thorn on December 15, 2006, 10:13 pm
Please log in for more thread options
wrote:
show/hide quoted text
>Can anyone identify where in the world the shuttle was over when this
>photo was taken?
>http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/images/shuttle/sts-116/html/s116e05983.html
Maybe New Zealand?
|
|
Posted by Xizor on December 15, 2006, 10:55 pm
Please log in for more thread options Brian Thorn wrote:
show/hide quoted text
> wrote:
>> Can anyone identify where in the world the shuttle was over when this
>> photo was taken?
>>
http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/images/shuttle/sts-116/html/s116e05983.html
show/hide quoted text
> Maybe New Zealand?
Correct, top of the South Island.
Xizor
|
|
Posted by John Doe on December 16, 2006, 3:02 am
Please log in for more thread options Xizor wrote:
show/hide quoted text
>> >>
http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/images/shuttle/sts-116/html/s116e05983.html
show/hide quoted text
> > Maybe New Zealand?
>
> Correct, top of the South Island.
That was my first reaction too. But the shapes just didn't look right.
There is a scale issue involved. Also, the antenna is obscuring the
wellington harbour.
With the wrong scaling interpretation, the north island portion we see
could have been Cape Paliser. But the alignment with the south island
didn't match.
But by lowering the scale to cover a much greater area, the north island
section covers cape paliser on the soutgh-east tip all the way to
Oteranga Bay on th south-west portion. And the north-west section would
go up towards Wanganui (but not getting that far).
Wellington Harbour is somewhat visible if you real;ly know what to look for.
And for the south island, the reduced scaling makes it valid terrian
when you include cape farewell on the north west tip , Able Tasman
peninsula, Tasman bay (at the bottom of which is the town of Nelson) and
then the rugged coastline which include tyhe queen charlotte sound used
by the ferries to reach picton.
The Wairau river is very visible. It reaches the pacific ocea on eastern
side at Bleinheim.
On teh west , it goes down south to somewhere north of Westport. On the
east coast, it would go down to just north of Chistchurch. A number of
large rivers are very visible.
It is an interesting exercise of trying to view the image in different
scales relative the the planet to try to figure out how much real
territory is being covered.
|
|
Posted by Danny Deger on December 18, 2006, 9:10 pm
Please log in for more thread options
show/hide quoted text
> Xizor wrote:
>>> >>
http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/images/shuttle/sts-116/html/s116e05983.html
show/hide quoted text
>> > Maybe New Zealand?
>> Correct, top of the South Island.
> That was my first reaction too. But the shapes just didn't look right.
> There is a scale issue involved. Also, the antenna is obscuring the
> wellington harbour.
> With the wrong scaling interpretation, the north island portion we see
> could have been Cape Paliser. But the alignment with the south island
> didn't match.
> But by lowering the scale to cover a much greater area, the north island
> section covers cape paliser on the soutgh-east tip all the way to
> Oteranga Bay on th south-west portion. And the north-west section would
> go up towards Wanganui (but not getting that far).
> Wellington Harbour is somewhat visible if you real;ly know what to look
> for.
> And for the south island, the reduced scaling makes it valid terrian
> when you include cape farewell on the north west tip , Able Tasman
> peninsula, Tasman bay (at the bottom of which is the town of Nelson) and
> then the rugged coastline which include tyhe queen charlotte sound used
> by the ferries to reach picton.
> The Wairau river is very visible. It reaches the pacific ocea on eastern
> side at Bleinheim.
> On teh west , it goes down south to somewhere north of Westport. On the
> east coast, it would go down to just north of Chistchurch. A number of
> large rivers are very visible.
> It is an interesting exercise of trying to view the image in different
> scales relative the the planet to try to figure out how much real
> territory is being covered.
The caption says New Zeeland guys.
Danny Deger
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | Why Won't the Space Shuttle Land Over the U.S.? | August 8, 2005, 8:40 am |
| If a shuttle couldnt land and didnt make ISS | August 24, 2006, 10:18 am |
| NASA's Space Shuttle Discovery Scheduled to Land Aug. 8 | August 5, 2005, 10:29 pm |
| NASA'S SPACE SHUTTLE DISCOVERY SET TO LAND MONDAY | July 14, 2006, 10:35 am |
| Shuttle Photo | July 29, 2005, 5:43 pm |
| Shuttle Photo | May 21, 2006, 9:57 pm |
| ISS, Shuttle, and Sun Photo | September 29, 2006, 10:21 am |
| mass properties | May 6, 2009, 3:51 pm |
| Shuttle Damage Photo/Info from Earlier Flight? | July 28, 2005, 4:09 pm |
| Shuttle Zig-Zag Photo -- Nutty Website says, F-k you, copyright owner | April 10, 2006, 5:54 pm |
|
|
|
XML Sitemap
>photo was taken?
>http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/images/shuttle/sts-116/html/s116e05983.html