|
Posted by Jorge R. Frank on January 9, 2006, 11:05 pm
Please log in for more thread options
show/hide quoted text
>
>> On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 03:35:05 +0000, Greg D. Moore (Strider) wrote:
>> >> On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 15:53:31 +0000, Greg D. Moore (Strider) wrote:
>> >> > Once again the "myth" that the photo linked from
> http://www.shoutwire.com/comments/2735/Rare_photo_of_Space_Shuttle_Soni
> c_Boom
>> >> The picture is upside-down.
>> > Why, I believe you're right.
>> > Gee, we could probably do a "how many things wrong with this
>> > photo/url"
>> Two, the condensation aft of the tail, what else is GIMPed up?
>
> I don't think it was photoshopped (other than probably flipping it.)
I don't think it was flipped, just rotated 90 degrees clockwise.
--
JRF
Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail,
check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and
think one step ahead of IBM.
|
|
Posted by Craig Fink on January 10, 2006, 7:59 am
Please log in for more thread options
On Mon, 09 Jan 2006 23:05:21 -0600, Jorge R. Frank wrote:
show/hide quoted text
>
>>
>>> On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 03:35:05 +0000, Greg D. Moore (Strider) wrote:
>>> >> On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 15:53:31 +0000, Greg D. Moore (Strider) wrote:
>>> >> > Once again the "myth" that the photo linked from
>> http://www.shoutwire.com/comments/2735/Rare_photo_of_Space_Shuttle_Soni
>> c_Boom
>>> >> The picture is upside-down.
>>> > Why, I believe you're right.
>>> > Gee, we could probably do a "how many things wrong with this
>>> > photo/url"
>>> Two, the condensation aft of the tail, what else is GIMPed up?
>>
>> I don't think it was photoshopped (other than probably flipping it.)
>
> I don't think it was flipped, just rotated 90 degrees clockwise.
http://www.anomalies-unlimited.com/Odd Pics 2/Shuttleboom.html
Flipped or rotated, I'd like to see the original. To me it looks GIMPed
up. I really find it hard to believe that condensation could form aft of
the tail on ascent. Right next to the SSME and SRB exhaust. Maybe there is
an area aft of the tail shaded from the exhaust radiation.
Very Small Pressure/Temperature Drop vs Glowing hot SSME/SRB Exhaust?
Anybody know what flight this is?
Still Skeptical,
--
Craig Fink
Courtesy E-Mail Welcome @ WeBeGood@GMail.Com
|
|
Posted by snidely on January 10, 2006, 11:04 am
Please log in for more thread options
Craig Fink wrote:
show/hide quoted text
>[...]
> Flipped or rotated, I'd like to see the original. To me it looks GIMPed
> up. I really find it hard to believe that condensation could form aft of
> the tail on ascent. Right next to the SSME and SRB exhaust. Maybe there is
> an area aft of the tail shaded from the exhaust radiation.
In the L selecion of the NASA link Andrew Plotkin provided, the
"cloud" coming off the rudder seems to be shaped at the inboard end by
the plume from the 3rd engine bell.
Also, the caption reads, " secondary effects can be seen on the SRB
forward skirt, Orbiter vertical stabilizer and wing trailing edges
(behind SSME's)"
The WTEs must be what looks like is coming from between the bells.
Due to grain effects (original was 35mm motion picture film), the M
selection is actually easier to look at.
/dps
|
|
Posted by Andrew Plotkin on January 10, 2006, 5:25 pm
Please log in for more thread options show/hide quoted text
>
>
> http://www.anomalies-unlimited.com/Odd Pics 2/Shuttleboom.html
>
> Flipped or rotated, I'd like to see the original. To me it looks GIMPed
> up. I really find it hard to believe that condensation could form aft of
> the tail on ascent. Right next to the SSME and SRB exhaust. Maybe there is
> an area aft of the tail shaded from the exhaust radiation.
show/hide quoted text
So, there you are. Says it's STS-106. Rotated 90 degeees.
--Z
"And Aholibamah bare Jeush, and Jaalam, and Korah: these were the borogoves..."
*
"Bush has kept America safe from terrorism since 9/11." Too bad his job was to
keep America safe *on* 9/11.
|
|
Posted by Craig Fink on January 10, 2006, 2:26 pm
Please log in for more thread options On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:25:36 +0000, Andrew Plotkin wrote:
show/hide quoted text
Thanks :-)
--
Craig Fink
Courtesy E-Mail Welcome @ WeBeGood@GMail.Com
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | sonic boom | August 9, 2005, 12:55 pm |
| BOOM, BOOM! | August 9, 2005, 5:15 am |
| Boom-Oom! The Orbiter Is Here | June 22, 2007, 3:53 pm |
| If a 4% concentration of hydrogen in ambient air goes BOOM... | March 11, 2008, 3:05 am |
| Loss of L5L -- what impact on boom ops, rndz/docking, reboost, other activities | July 2, 2006, 1:05 am |
| Shuttle Photo | July 29, 2005, 5:43 pm |
| Shuttle Photo | May 21, 2006, 9:57 pm |
| ISS, Shuttle, and Sun Photo | September 29, 2006, 10:21 am |
| STS-116 Launch Photo | January 17, 2007, 4:59 pm |
| O Hare UFO Photo? | January 25, 2007, 9:39 am |
|
XML Sitemap
>> On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 03:35:05 +0000, Greg D. Moore (Strider) wrote:
>> >> On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 15:53:31 +0000, Greg D. Moore (Strider) wrote:
>> >> > Once again the "myth" that the photo linked from
> http://www.shoutwire.com/comments/2735/Rare_photo_of_Space_Shuttle_Soni
> c_Boom
>> >> The picture is upside-down.
>> > Why, I believe you're right.
>> > Gee, we could probably do a "how many things wrong with this
>> > photo/url"
>> Two, the condensation aft of the tail, what else is GIMPed up?
>
> I don't think it was photoshopped (other than probably flipping it.)