Losers from Obama's proposed 2011 budget

Losers from Obama's proposed 2011 budget

NewsGroups | Search | About
 sci.space.station    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
Losers from Obama's proposed 2011 budget Mike 02-01-2010
Posted by Mike on February 1, 2010, 1:12 pm
Please log in for more thread options


the Congressional Black Caucus and many anti-science liberals got
their wishes....

Moon-travel boosters. The budget adds $6 billion to NASA's budget over
five years, extending the International Space Station, but it abandons
the Constellation program to return humans to the moon. Instead, it
directs NASA to invest in the development of U.S. commercial space
taxi services to ferry astronauts to the space station.

Posted by Matt Wiser on February 1, 2010, 1:29 pm
Please log in for more thread options


show/hide quoted text

I concur entirely. Bleeding hearts....Great nations are supposed to be
able to do great things, even in sour times. But congress has to
approve, and many members with ties to NASA have already vowed to
fight this proposal.

Posted by OM on February 1, 2010, 2:24 pm
Please log in for more thread options


On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 10:29:06 -0800 (PST), Matt Wiser

show/hide quoted text
vowed to
show/hide quoted text

...It's one of the reasons I've always felt that funding for manned
space should not be controllable by Congress, because something this
important can't be trusted to skirtchasers whose only interests are
pork barrels and what page boys they can pork.

OM

--

]=====================================[
] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [
] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [
] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [
]=====================================[

Posted by Jonathan on February 1, 2010, 5:56 pm
Please log in for more thread options



show/hide quoted text


Oh my god, the worst thing that could possibly happen is
to let the rocket scientists decide space policy.
They'd have us building wasteful and useless Saturn V's,
lunar landers and stuff no one wants or needs.

Oh that's right, that's what they tried to do.

You folks are just too dense to realize that
flushing a program after spending $9 billion
is a fiasco born of corruption. When an
industry gets to write it's own ticket, disaster
happens. Bush let Big Oil write the Energy bill.
He let Big Pharma write health care legislation
and he let Lockheed brow-beat the nation into
another moon-shot.

And this is what happens...just like letting Wall Street
perform it's own oversight and......CRASH!

Goes the whole ball of wax.

And what makes me even more disgusted is that
no one here seems to grasp what a golden opportunity
awaits for a new far better goal.

Now that the trash (The Vision) has finally been
bagged and tied.


s






show/hide quoted text



Posted by Damien Valentine on February 2, 2010, 2:54 pm
Please log in for more thread options


show/hide quoted text

There are plenty of activists who will object to any experiments you
want to run on the Moon. Heck, people objected to the Pioneer probes
because they had naked people on them.

show/hide quoted text

Turns out there's not a lot of profitable minerals on the Moon. The
best you can hope for is titanium, which currently goes for about $20
a pound. Aluminum, magnesium, silicon etc. are worth even less.

show/hide quoted text

Which could be done in orbit with expanded space stations.

show/hide quoted text

You mean sustainable agriculture? How would that be easier to
experiment with on the Moon?

show/hide quoted text

You can pick up helium-3 on the Moon, if you're willing to strip-mine
a couple million tons of regolith. But unless you've got the right
kind of fusion reactor to put the helium-3 in, it's not going to do
you much good.

show/hide quoted text
ld
show/hide quoted text

Earth dust and Moon dust are not the same. Why should the lessons
from one carry over to the other?

Similar ThreadsPosted
what what a couple of losers little alan erskine & assoc. and little marty wallace & assoc. are a couple of losers making harassing Ku Klux Klan phone calls from 0622909622 with heavy breathing, silence and with the words August 7, 2008, 12:30 pm
NASA Budget Press Conference February 9, 2006, 1:45 pm
Space Station Modules Proposed by UK Scientists January 17, 2008, 12:38 am

other useful resources:
NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Kennedy Space Center
European Space Agency
China National Space Administration
Russian Space Research Institute
Canadian Space Agency

Air-Space.us XML SitemapXML Sitemap

Contact Us | Privacy Policy