Mars Global Surveyor : It's Dead, Jim.

Mars Global Surveyor : It's Dead, Jim.

NewsGroups | Search | About
 sci.space.station    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content add this group's latest topics to your Google content
Subject Author Date
Mars Global Surveyor : It's Dead, Jim. Thomas Lee Elifritz 11-14-2006
Posted by Thomas Lee Elifritz on November 14, 2006, 4:24 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Get over it.

http://cosmic.lifeform.org

Posted by Brian Gaff on November 15, 2006, 4:47 am
Please log in for more thread options
Not heard the latest myself, but I'd not have thought a dodgy panel motor
was too much of a problem. I seem to recall that there were problems with
the arrays at the very start though.

Brian

--
Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email.
graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them
Email: briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________


show/hide quoted text



Posted by Thomas Lee Elifritz on November 15, 2006, 10:26 am
Please log in for more thread options
Brian Gaff wrote:

show/hide quoted text

I used to think Mars was a small planet.

It was a great mission, but I do believe it's over. Cigars all around.

Don't we have better things to do, like drive the rovers as fast as
possible away from any glaring evidence of water or putative fossils?

Certainly anyone can see the need for a new large Deep Space Network
now. To the asteroids it doesn't have to be that large, just redundant.

We need a CERES Reconnaissance Orbiter, and we need a generic DAWN class
spacecraft capable of survey missions to multiple large asteroids.

All of this is going to require large bandwidth to the asteroids.

For Mars, we're going to need cheap generic rovers.

Bandwidth, bandwidth, bandwidth.

http://cosmic.lifeform.org

Posted by Ed Kyle on November 16, 2006, 12:30 am
Please log in for more thread options
It would be seriously bad news were something like this to happen to a
solar-powered Orion spacecraft - especially while the crew were on the
lunar surface. If the thing drifts out of solar panel alignment for
just a few hours, it is "lights out" - permanently.

- Ed Kyle


Posted by Thomas Lee Elifritz on November 16, 2006, 10:24 am
Please log in for more thread options
Ed Kyle wrote:

show/hide quoted text

Good point. Another good example of bad decision making.

http://cosmic.lifeform.org

Similar ThreadsPosted
STS -116 / Mars Global Surveyor Science Update / Expedition 14 December 6, 2006, 4:20 pm
Mars photo January 25, 2007, 3:01 pm
Who wants to travel to Mars with me??? May 29, 2007, 10:23 am
Mars Lab delayed two years,,, December 4, 2008, 4:04 pm
Re: Does Mars need women? Russians say no May 9, 2005, 1:26 am
ISS - MCA, Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter Mission March 8, 2006, 9:03 am
Re: Terraforming the moon, before doing Mars or Venus January 2, 2007, 11:14 am
Moon/Mars trade studies? October 11, 2007, 6:10 am
Clays in Mawrth Vallis - Mars February 20, 2008, 8:52 pm
Re: Mars rover sticker shock February 25, 2008, 5:17 pm

other useful resources:
NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Kennedy Space Center
European Space Agency
China National Space Administration
Russian Space Research Institute
Canadian Space Agency

Air-Space.us XML SitemapXML Sitemap

Contact Us | Privacy Policy