|
Posted by on April 16, 2007, 6:38 pm
Please log in for more thread options
April 15, 2007
Katherine Trinidad
Headquarters, Washington
202-358-3749
Kyle Herring
Johnson Space Center, Houston
281-483-5111
RELEASE: 07-89
NASA UPDATES SHUTTLE TARGET LAUNCH DATES
HOUSTON - During a meeting Monday at NASA's Johnson Space Center,
agency officials revised the target launch dates for space shuttle
flights during the next 12 months. The space shuttle and
International Space Station programs agreed to the changes during a
meeting to evaluate options following the STS-117 mission's delay,
which was caused by hail damage to the external fuel tank.
Flights beyond April 2008 have not been assessed. Both shuttle and
station program officials will continue to consider options for the
remainder of the shuttle flights and those target launch dates are
subject to change.
Upcoming shuttle missions:
-STS-117 targeted for no earlier than June 8, 2007, on Atlantis
-STS-118 targeted for no earlier than Aug. 9, 2007, on Endeavour
-STS-120 targeted for no earlier than Oct. 20, 2007, on Discovery
instead of Atlantis
-STS-122 targeted for no earlier than Dec. 6, 2007, on Atlantis
instead of Discovery
-STS-123 targeted for no earlier than Feb. 14, 2008, on Endeavour
-STS-124 targeted for no earlier than April 24, 2008, on Discovery
instead of Atlantis
The shuttles for STS-120, 122 and 124 were exchanged to best meet the
demands of the missions and to have the least amount of impact on the
flight schedule.
The shuttle launch manifest is available online at:
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/structure/iss_manifest.html
For details on upcoming shuttle missions and their crews, visit:
http://www.nasa.gov/shuttle
-end-
|
|
Posted by android on April 16, 2007, 8:01 pm
Please log in for more thread options
show/hide quoted text
alright
at first I was surprised
http://click.adultsingles.com/partner/click.asp?id=72473&site=ads&typ=click
honestly i THINK it's wrong
|
|
Posted by Craig Fink on April 16, 2007, 8:44 pm
Please log in for more thread options baalke@earthlink.net wrote:
show/hide quoted text
> -STS-117 targeted for no earlier than June 8, 2007, on Atlantis
> -STS-118 targeted for no earlier than Aug. 9, 2007, on Endeavour
> -STS-120 targeted for no earlier than Oct. 20, 2007, on Discovery
> instead of Atlantis
> -STS-122 targeted for no earlier than Dec. 6, 2007, on Atlantis
> instead of Discovery
> -STS-123 targeted for no earlier than Feb. 14, 2008, on Endeavour
> -STS-124 targeted for no earlier than April 24, 2008, on Discovery
> instead of Atlantis
show/hide quoted text
<pulls napkin out of the drawer>
Six in the next year, that's 12 reasonably sized tanks to start a LEO
Futures Market with. Twelve different products in the LEO Futures Market
started in the next year, or so. That is over .1 megakilograms of storage
show/hide quoted text
facilities, all for free <What was it Reagan sai...>, not including
product.
show/hide quoted text
<puts napkin back in drawer, thinks, "I'm going to need a bigger napkin">
|
|
Posted by Craig Fink on April 17, 2007, 8:01 am
Please log in for more thread options Ah, you've figured me out. How exciting for you. Thanks for the advice.
Reference, Transmittal Memo #??????, written by Craig E. Fink, from
McDonnell Douglas, to NASA JSC Library, dated shortly after Ronald Reagan,
who on behalf of the United States Government and NASA, made the offer** of
free External Tanks to anyone. If you care to go look up the references.
(**certain rules may apply, offer void where prohibited)
It's not a question of _if_ the External Tank can be taken to orbit for
free, but _how_ _high_ the External Tank can be taken, performance wise. As
the Space Station comes down into a lower Orbit, it approaches this
altitude from above. If it comes down enough, it crosses this altitude. The
MEMO addressed the technical aspects (GN&C, performance) of taking the
External Tank to Orbit. I'm sure there are other aspects of the NASA study,
but performance wasn't and isn't the issue. In addition, there are other
things that were not addressed in this MEMO that could reasonably be done
to further raise the altitude of break even point. In other words, take the
_BIG_ payload and the _Externel Tank_ to the Space Station.
I haven't met an ET before, but looking forward to the day. I'm an
Earthling, what planet are you from?
<pulls napkin back out, thinks, "Maybe I should have used an envelope, some
people don't seem to understand the "design by napkin" technique. Humm,
show/hide quoted text
reaches for nearest envelope with a clean back.>
LEO Futures Market commodity #1 or 12, LOX,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid_oxygen
...Density, 1.141 kg/L
LEO Futures Market storage facility allocation, 1 large tank.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle_external_tank
...Volume, 1,497,440 liters
LEO Futures Market initial LOX market size,
...Lots (units) of LOX available for storage and trading, 1,700,000 one
kilogram.
LEO Futures Market estimated potential value of LOX market (at full
capacity) ...at $50,000 per kilogram, yields $85,000,000,000 market in LEO
for LOX with the first. <Hummm, that's a lot of zeros, better make an
show/hide quoted text
adjustment> ... $5,000 per kilogram, yield $8.5 Billion potential market.
Six external tanks would yield a potential LEO Futures Market greater than
$50 Billion dollars with the first location in LEO. Seems to have a lot of
potential, I wonder who might need 1.7 million kilograms of LOX on a
regular basis?
I guess NASA needs to think _BIG_ instead of _small_ in their plans to
explore the Moon and Mars.
--
Craig Fink
Courtesy E-Mail Welcome @ WeBeGood@GMail.Com
--
Derek Lyons wrote:
show/hide quoted text
>
>>baalke@earthlink.net wrote:
>>Six in the next year, that's 12 reasonably sized tanks to start a LEO
>>Futures Market with. Twelve different products in the LEO Futures Market
>>started in the next year, or so. That is over .1 megakilograms of storage
>>facilities, all for free <What was it Reagan sai...>, not including
>>product.
>
> Sure in some imaginary world where we have shuttle flights carrying
> essentially nothing to orbit, thus freeing their payload capacity for
> ferrying the ET into orbit.
>
> We don't live in such a world.
>
>
> No, you need to adjust your dosages.
>
> D.
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | NASA updates Shuttle return to flight implementation plan | March 19, 2005, 5:40 am |
| NASA Gives 'Go' for Shuttle Endeavour Launch on Aug. 7 | July 26, 2007, 4:38 pm |
| NASA Gives "Go" for Space Shuttle Launch on Oct. 23 | October 17, 2007, 4:52 pm |
| NASA Gives "Go" for Space Shuttle Launch on Dec. 6 | December 3, 2007, 2:05 pm |
| NASA Gives 'Go' For Space Shuttle Launch on June 8 | May 31, 2007, 4:50 pm |
| STS-131 Updates | April 18, 2010, 12:48 pm |
| Re: Updates to www.jamesoberg.com | February 9, 2007, 12:41 pm |
| Expedition 20 - STS 125 - STS 127 updates | June 4, 2009, 4:50 pm |
| NASA NAMES DOI TO SHUTTLE CREW TO LAUNCH JAPANESE MODULE | May 5, 2006, 3:15 pm |
| NASA Targets June Launch for Space Shuttle Atlantis | April 11, 2007, 1:00 pm |
|
> Katherine Trinidad
> Headquarters, Washington
> 202-358-3749
> Kyle Herring
> Johnson Space Center, Houston
> 281-483-5111
> RELEASE: 07-89
> NASA UPDATES SHUTTLE TARGET LAUNCH DATES
> HOUSTON - During a meeting Monday at NASA's Johnson Space Center,
> agency officials revised the target launch dates for space shuttle
> flights during the next 12 months. The space shuttle and
> International Space Station programs agreed to the changes during a
> meeting to evaluate options following the STS-117 mission's delay,
> which was caused by hail damage to the external fuel tank.
> Flights beyond April 2008 have not been assessed. Both shuttle and
> station program officials will continue to consider options for the
> remainder of the shuttle flights and those target launch dates are
> subject to change.
> Upcoming shuttle missions:
> -STS-117 targeted for no earlier than June 8, 2007, on Atlantis
> -STS-118 targeted for no earlier than Aug. 9, 2007, on Endeavour
> -STS-120 targeted for no earlier than Oct. 20, 2007, on Discovery
> instead of Atlantis
> -STS-122 targeted for no earlier than Dec. 6, 2007, on Atlantis
> instead of Discovery
> -STS-123 targeted for no earlier than Feb. 14, 2008, on Endeavour
> -STS-124 targeted for no earlier than April 24, 2008, on Discovery
> instead of Atlantis
> The shuttles for STS-120, 122 and 124 were exchanged to best meet the
> demands of the missions and to have the least amount of impact on the
> flight schedule.
> The shuttle launch manifest is available online at:
> http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/structure/iss_manifest.html
> For details on upcoming shuttle missions and their crews, visit:
> http://www.nasa.gov/shuttle
> -end-