|
Posted by OM on March 28, 2009, 4:16 pm
Please log in for more thread options
....Jorge probably knows the answer to this one, but what's the most #
of shuttle tiles replaced post-mission, and which orbiter received all
those dings?
OM
--
]=====================================[
] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [
] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [
] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [
]=====================================[
|
|
Posted by Jim Kingdon on March 29, 2009, 9:28 pm
Please log in for more thread options
show/hide quoted text
> ....Jorge probably knows the answer to this one, but what's the most #
> of shuttle tiles replaced post-mission, and which orbiter received all
> those dings?
This article isn't really heavy on technical details, but it seems
that STS-27 in 1988 had some 700 tiles damaged:
http://spaceflightnow.com/shuttle/sts119/090327sts27/
This wasn't (primarily) a bunch of dings, but a single STS-107-style
impact from debris on ascent.
What I find most interesting about this account is just how limiting
the encryption was in those days. CPUs have gotten a lot more
powerful since then...
|
|
Posted by Jorge R. Frank on March 30, 2009, 10:33 pm
Please log in for more thread options OM wrote:
show/hide quoted text
> ....Jorge probably knows the answer to this one, but what's the most #
> of shuttle tiles replaced post-mission, and which orbiter received all
> those dings?
Per the previous post, STS-27 is probably tha winna, but STS-87 wasn't
far behind.
There is a chart in the CAIB report, vol 1, but obviously it only covers
up to STS-107. However, I can say with some certainty that the
subsequent flights have had significantly lower rates of tile replacement.
|
|
Posted by OM on March 31, 2009, 7:48 am
Please log in for more thread options On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:33:32 EDT, "Jorge R. Frank"
show/hide quoted text
>There is a chart in the CAIB report, vol 1, but obviously it only covers
>up to STS-107. However, I can say with some certainty that the
>subsequent flights have had significantly lower rates of tile replacement.
show/hide quoted text
<Slaps self>
....Dammit, I *knew* I'd seen that chart somewhere, but I couldn't
remember it to save my ass. Thanks, Jorge, I'll pass the reference on
to the person who asked me. STS-27 it is, as we obviously haven't had
the "ding" issues we did on the earlier, pre-Columbia flights.
OM
--
]=====================================[
] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [
] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [
] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [
]=====================================[
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | Titanium in the Shuttle | March 21, 2005, 11:28 pm |
| Shuttle orientation during climb. | June 19, 2006, 4:57 pm |
| Shuttle fuel cycling? | July 16, 2009, 11:46 am |
| Shuttle Entry Heating | March 25, 2005, 12:17 pm |
| professional opinions solicited on shuttle launch | April 29, 2005, 1:01 pm |
| question on Shenzhou 5 | October 12, 2005, 10:57 am |
| Question about air processing on ISS | October 28, 2005, 1:53 pm |
| Airship to Orbit question | December 13, 2005, 1:22 pm |
| Airship to Orbit question | December 13, 2005, 2:02 pm |
| Space Station Question | February 20, 2006, 4:51 pm |
|
XML Sitemap
> of shuttle tiles replaced post-mission, and which orbiter received all
> those dings?